Human-Centered
System Design Methodology
Hooey, B. L. & Foyle, D. C. (2007). Requirements for a design knowledge capture tool to support NASA’s Complex Systems. International Workshop on Managing Knowledge for Space Missions. Pasadena, CA (July 17-19. 2007).
McCandless, J. W., McCann, R. S., Barshi, I., Kaiser, M. K., & Andre, A.D. (2006). Panel presentation: Human factors technologies for space exploration. In proceedings of Space 2006. San Jose, CA: AIAA.
Foyle, D. C., Newman, R. L., & Hooey, B. L. (2005).
Test and evaluation of visionic
systems: It's all in the questions that you ask. In Toward Recommended Methods for Testing and Evaluation of EV and E/SV Based Visionic Devices. Meeting Proceedings NATO/RTO-MP-HFM-125, Paper 2 (presentation only). Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO.
Andre, A. D., Hooey, B. L, & Foyle, D. C. (2005). Capturing the Research
and Development Process of Aviation Systems: Creating a Multi-Media
Living Legacy. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium
on Aviation Psychology. Oklahoma City, April 18-21.
Foyle, D. C., & Hooey, B. L. (2003).
Improving evaluation and system design through the use of off-nominal
testing: A methodology for scenario development. Proceedings
of the Twelfth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology.
397-402. Dayton, Ohio: Wright State University.
Newman, R. L. & Foyle, D. C. (2003). Test
scenarios for rare events. Proceedings of the Twelfth International
Symposium on Aviation Psychology. 873-882. Dayton, Ohio: Wright
State University.
Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., & Andre, A. D. (2002).
A human-centered methodology for the design, evaluation, and integration
of cockpit displays. In proceedings of the NATO RTO SCI and
SET Symposium on Enhanced and Synthetic Vision Systems. September,
10-12, 2002. Ottawa, Canada.
Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., & Andre, A. D. (2001).
The design of aircraft cockpit displays
for low-visibility taxi operations. In A. G. Gale (Ed.) Vision
in Vehicles IX. Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Back to top
Head-Up
Displays and Operator Attention
Wilson, J. R., Hooey, B. L., & Foyle, D. C. (2005).
Head-Up Display Symbology
for Surface Operations: Eye Tracking Analysis of Command-guidance
vs. Situation-guidance Formats. Proceedings of the 13th International
Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Oklahoma City, April 18 - 21.
Foyle, D. C., Hooey, B. L., Wilson, J. R. & Johnson,
W. A. (2002). HUD symbology
for surface operations: Command-guidance vs. situation-guidance
formats. SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 111, 647-658.
Wilson, J. R., Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C. & Williams,
J. L. (2002). Comparing pilots'
taxi performance, situation awareness and workload using command-guidance,
situation-guidance and hybrid head-up display symbologies.
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and
Ergonomic Society, 16-20. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
Dowell, S. R., Foyle, D. C., Hooey, B. L. & Williams,
J. L. (2002). The effect of visual
location on cognitive tunneling with superimposed HUD symbology.
Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors
and Ergonomic Society, 121-125. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
Foyle, D. C., Dowell, S. R., & Hooey, B. L.
(2001). Cognitive tunneling
in head-up display (HUD) superimposed symbology: Effects of information
location. In R. S. Jensen, L. Chang, & K. Singleton (Eds.),
Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on Aviation
Psychology, 143:1-143:6. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Levy, J. L., Foyle, D. C., & McCann, R. S.,
(1998). Performance benefits with
scene-linked HUD symbology: An attentional phenomenon? Proceedings
of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society, 11-15. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
Shelden, S. G., Foyle, D. C., & McCann, R. S.
(1997). Effects of scene-linked
symbology on flight performance. Proceedings of the 41st Annual
Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 294-298.
Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
McCann, R. S., & Foyle, D. C., (1995). Scene-linked
symbology to improve situation awareness . AGARD Conference
Proceedings, N0. 555, Aerospace Medical Panel Conference on Situation
Awareness, 16:1 - 16:11.
Foyle, D. C., McCann, R. S., & Shelden, S. G.
(1995). Attentional issues
with superimposed symbology: Formats for scene-linked displays.
In R. S. Jensen, & L. A. Rakovan (Eds.), Proceedings of the
Eigth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 98-103.
Columbus, Ohio: Ohio Satate University.
McCann, R. S., & Foyle, D. C., (1994). Superimposed
symbology: Attentional problems and design solutions. SAE
Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 103, 2009-2016.
Foyle, D. C., McCann, R. S., Sanford, B. D., &
Schwirzke, M. F. J. (1993). Attentional
effects with sumperimposed symbology: Implications for head-up
displays (HUD). Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of
the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1340 - 1344. Santa Monica,
CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
McCann, R. S., Foyle, D. C., & Johnston, J.
C. (1993). Attentional limitations
with head-up displays. In R. S. Jensen(Ed.), Proceedings of
the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 70-75.
Columbus Ohio: Ohio State University.
McCann, R, S., Lynch, J., Foyle, D.C.,& Johnston,
J. C. (1993). Modelling attentional
effects with head-up displays. Proceedings of the 37th Annual
Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1345 -1349.
Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Sanford, B. D., Foyle, D.
C., McCann, R. S., & Jordan, K. (1993). Head-up
displays: Effect of information location on the processing of
superimposed symbology . Proceedings of the Seventh International
Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 81-87. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio
Satate University.
Foyle, D. C., Sanford, B.
D., & McCann, R. S. (1991).
Attentional issues in superimposed flight symbology. In R.
S. Jensen (Ed.). Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium
on Aviation Psychology, 577-582. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Back to top
Situation Awareness Displays:
Design and Usage
Foyle, D. C., Andre, A. D., & Hooey, B. L. (2005).
Situation Awareness in an Augmented
Reality Cockpit: Design, Viewpoints and Cognitive Glue. In
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer
Interaction. Las Vegas, NV.
Wickens, C. D. (2005). Attention and Aviation Display Layout: Research and Modeling. (AHFD-05-21/NASA-05-8). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Human Factors Division
Wickens, C. D. (2005). Display
Formatting and Situation Awareness Model (DFSAM): An Approach
to Aviation Display Design. (AHFD-05-14/NASA-05-5). Savoy,
IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Human
Factors Division.
Andre, A. D., Lins, J. M. C., & Wilson, J. (2003).
Conveying message criticality
via datalink. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium
on Aviation Psychology. 54-59. Dayton, Ohio: Wright State University.
Purcell, K. P., & Andre, A. D. (2001). The
influence of callouts on pilot visual attention to an electronic
moving map. In R. S. Jensen, L. Chang, & K. Singleton
(Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium on
Aviation Psychology. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Purcell, K. P. (2001). The
influence of alerts (callouts) on pilot visual attention to an
electronic taxi map. Unpublished master's thesis, San Jose
State University, San Jose, CA.
Graeber, D. A., & Andre, A. D., (1999). Assessing
visual attention of pilots while using electronic moving maps
for taxiing. In R. S. Jensen, B. Cox, J. D. Callister, &
R. Lavis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium
on Aviation Psychology, 2 , 791-796. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State
University.
Back to top
Airport Surface (Taxi) Operations
Williams, J. L., Hooey, B. L. & Foyle, D. C. (2006). 4-D taxi clearances: Pilots' usage of time- and speed-based formats. Proceedings of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Paper AIAA-2006-6611.
Hooey, B. L., & Foyle, D. C. (2006). Pilot navigation errors on the airport surface: Identifying contributing factors and mitigating solutions. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16(1), 51-76.
Hooey, B. L. (2005).
Improving Taxi Efficiency through Coordinated Runway Crossings.
Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology,
Oklahoma City, April 18-21.
Cheng, V.H. L, Yeh, A., Diaz, G. M., & Foyle,
D.C. (2004). Surface-operation
benefts of a collaborative automation concept. Prceedings
of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Paper
AIAA 2004-5409.
Cheng, V. H. L, Yeh, A., & Foyle, D.C. (2003).
Evaluation plan for
an airport surface-operation automation concept. Proceedings
of the AIAA's 3rd Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations
(ATIO) Technical Forum, Paper AIAA 2003-6796.
Cheng, V.H.L., & Foyle, D.C. (2002). Automation
tools for enhancing ground-operation situation awareness and flow
efficiency. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
and Control Conference, Paper AIAA 2002-4856.
Hooey, B. L., & Foyle, D. C. (2001). A
post-hoc analysis of navigation errors during surface operations:
Identification of contributing factors and mitigating solutions.
In R. S. Jensen, L. Chang, & K. Singleton (Eds.), Proceedings
of the Eleventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology,
226:1-226:6. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Cheng, V. H. L., Sharma, V., & Foyle, D. C.
(2001). A study of aircraft
taxi performance for enhancing airport surface traffic control.
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2(2),
39 - 54.
Andre, A.D. (1995). Information
requirements for low-visibility taxi operations: What pilots say.
Proceedings of the Eigth International Symposium on Aviation
Psychology, 484-488, Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Back to top
Taxiway Navigation and Situation Awareness
(T-NASA) Display Suite
Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., & Andre, A. D. (2000).
Integration of cockpit
displays for surface operations: The final stage of a human-centered
design approach. SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 109,
1053-1065.
Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., Andre, A. D., &
Parke, B. (2000).
Integrating datalink and cockpit display technologies into current
and future taxi operations. Proceedings of the AIAA/IEEE/SAE
19th Digital Avionics System Conference, 7.D.2-1 - 7.D.2-8. Philadelphia,
PA.
Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D. C., Andre, A. D., Purcell,
K., & Dowell, S. (2000). Optimizing
airport surface operations using datalink and the Taxiway Navigation
and Situation Awareness (T-NASA) display suite. Proceedings
of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
McCann, R., Foyle, D. C., Hooey, B. L., & Andre,
A. D. (1999). Pilot
interactions with an electronic display suite to support low-visibility
taxi. In Countering the Directed Energy Threat: Are Closed
Cockpits the Ultimate Answer? Third Symposium of the Human Factors
& Medicine Panel. RTA: NATO, 17:1-17:13.
Atkins, M.L., Foyle, D. C., Hooey, B. L., &
McCann, R. S. (1999). Head-up
display symbology for surface operations: Comparisons among scene-linked
symbology sets for optimum turn navigation. In R. S. Jensen,
B. Cox, J. D. Callister, & R.Lavis (Eds.), Proceedings of
the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 2 ,
784-790. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Hooey, B. L., Schwirzke, M. F. J., McCauley, M.
E., Renfroe, D., Purcell, K.P., & Andre, A. D. (1999). Issues
in the procedural implementation of low-visibility landing and
surface operation displays. In R. S. Jensen, B. Cox, J. D.
Callister, & R. Lavis (Eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth International
Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 2, 797-803. Columbus, Ohio:
Ohio State University.
Cotton, J., Johnson, W. A., Schwirzke, M. F. J.,
& Hennessy, R. T. (1999). Issues
in the Physical Integration of Terminal Area Productivity (TAP)
System and Displays into Commercial Aircraft. MTI Report No.
99-940506-36-2. Monterey, CA: Monterey Technologies, Inc.
Parke, B., Kanki, B., McCann, R. S., & Hooey,
B. (1999). The effects
of advanced navigation aids on crew roles and communication in
ground taxi. In R. S. Jensen, B.Cox, J. D. Callister, &
R. Lavis(Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium on Aviation
Psychology, 804-809. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Hooey, B. L., Schwirzke, M. F. J., McCauley, M.
E., Purcell, K. P., & Andre, A. D, (1998).
Initial Identification of Procedural Issues for the Future Deployment
of Terminal Area Productivity (TAP) Technologies. MTI Report
No. 98-940506-36-1. Monterey, CA: Monterey Technologies, Inc.
McCann, R.S., Hooey, B.L., Parke, B., Foyle, D.C.,
Andre, A.D. & Kanki, B. (1998). An
evaluation of the Taxiway Navigation and Situation Awareness (T-NASA)
system in high-fidelity simulation . SAE Transactions: Journal
of Aerospace, 107, 1612-1625.
Andre, A.D., Hooey, B. L., Foyle, D., & McCann,
R. (1998). Field evaluation
of T-NASA: Taxi Navigation and Situation Awareness system.
Proceedings of the IEEE/AIAA 17th Digital Avionics Systems Conference,
47:1 - 47:8, Seattle, WA.
Andre, A. D., & Hooey, B. L. (1998). The
human factors of conducting field research: Lessons learned from
the evaluation of T-NASA . Proceedings of the 42nd Annual
Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica,
CA: HFES.
McCann, R. S., Andre, A. D., Begault, D. R., Foyle,
D. C., & Wenzel, E. M., (1997). Enhancing
taxi performance under low visibility: Are moving maps enough?
Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society, 37-41, Santa Monica, CA: HFES
McCann, R.S., Foyle, D.C., Andre, A.D. & Battiste,
V. (1996). Advanced
navigation aids in the flight deck: Effects on ground taxi performance
under low-visibility conditions. SAE Transactions: Journal
of Aerospace, 105, 1419-1430.
Foyle, D. C., Andre, A. D., McCann, R. S., Wenzel,
E. M., Begault, D., & Battiste, V. (1996). Taxiway
Navigation and Situation Awareness (T-NASA) System: Problem, design
philosophy and description of an integrated display suite for
low-visibility airport surface operations. SAE Transactions:
Journal of Aerospace, 105, 1411-1418.
Back to top
Enhanced / Synthetic Vision
Foyle, D. C., Kaiser, M. K. & Johnson, W. W.
(1992). Visual cues in low-level
flight: Implications for pilotage, training, simulation, and enhanced/synthetic
vision systems, American Helicopter Society 48th Annual Forum,
Vol. 1, 253-260.
Foyle, D. C., Ahumada, A. J., Larimer, J., &
Sweet, B. T. (1992). Enhanced/synthetic
vision systems: Human factors research and implications for future
systems. SAE Transactions: Journal of Aerospace, 101, 1743-1741.
Foyle, D.C. & Kaiser, M.K. (1991). Pilot
distance estimation with unaided vision, night-vision goggles
and infrared imagery. SID International Symposium Digest of
Technical Papers, XXII, 314-317.
Kaiser, M.K. & Foyle, D.C. (1991). Human
factors issues in the use of night vision devices. Proceedings
of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, 1502-1506. Santa
Monica, CA: HFES.
Brickner, M.S. & Foyle, D.C. (1990). Field-of-view
effects on a simulated flight task with head-down and head-up
sensor imagery displays. Proceedings of the Human Factors
Society 34th Annual Meeting, 1567-1571. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
Back to top
Modeling Approach and Landing
with Synthetic Vision Systems -Final Reports
Foyle, D.C., Hooey, B.L., Byrne, M.D., Corker, K.M.,
Deutsch, S., Lebiere, C., Leiden, K. & Wickens, C.D. (2005).
Human Performance Models
of Pilot Behavior. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society 49th Annual Meeting, 1109-1113. Santa Monica: HFES.
Leiden, K., & Best, B. (2005). A
Cross-Model Comparison of Human Performance Modeling Tools Applied
to Aviation Safety. (Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro
Analysis & Design, Inc.
Best, B., Lebiere, C., Schunk, D., Johnson, I. ,&
Archer, R. (2004). Validating
a Cognitive Model of Approach Based on the ACT-R Architecture.
(Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis & Design,
Inc.
Byrne, M. D., & Kirlik, A, (2004).
Integrated Modeling of Cognition and the Information Environment:
A Closed-loop, ACT-R Approach to Modeling Approach and Landing
with and without Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) Technology.
(Technical Report). Houston, TX: Rice University.
Deutsch, S., & Pew, R. (2004). Modeling
the NASA SVS Part-task Scenarios in D-OMAR. (BBN Report No.
8399). Cambridge, MA: BBN Technologies.
Muraoka, K., Verma, S., Jadhav, A., Corker, K. M.,
& Gore, B. F. (2004). Human
Performance Modeling of Synthetic Vision System Use (Technical
Report). San Jose, CA: SJSU
Wickens, C. D., McCarley, J. S., Alexander, A. L.,
Thomas, L. C., Ambinder, M., & Zheng, S. (2005). Attention-Situation
Awareness (A-SA) Model of Pilot Error. (Technical Report AHFD-04-15/NASA-04-5).
Savoy, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Back to top
Proceedings of the 2003
NASA Aviation Safety Program Conference on Human Performance Modeling
of Approach and Landing with Augmented Displays (NASA Ames Research
Center, Moffett Field, California; March 6, 2003).
Download entire conference proceedings, individual
chapters, or conference presentation view graphs:
Entire Proceedings
(Edited by David C. Foyle, Allen Goodman, and Becky L. Hooey)
(PDF, 4.1 MB)
Chapter 1: An Overview
of the NASA Aviation Safety Program (AvSP) System-Wide Accident
Prevention (SWAP) Human Performance Modeling (HPM) Element
(David C. Foyle, Allen Goodman, and Becky L. Hooey) (PDF, 580
K)
Chapter 2: Cognitive Task
Analysis of Commercial Jet Aircraft Pilots During Instrument Approaches
for Baseline and Synthetic Vision Displays (John Keller, Kenneth
Leiden, and Ronald Small) (PDF, 1.5 MB)
Chapter 3: Characterizing
Visual Performance During Approach and Landing With and Without
a Synthetic Vision Display: A Part-Task Study (Allen Goodman,
Becky L. Hooey, David C. Foyle, and John R. Wilson) (PDF, 1.7
MB)
Chapter 4: Integrated
Modeling of Cognition and the Information Environment: A Closed-Loop,
ACT-R Approach to Modeling Approach and Landing With and Without
Synthetic Vision System (SVS) Technology (Michael D. Byrne,
and Alex Kirlik) (PDF, 1.1 MB)
Chapter 5: Human Performance
Modeling Predictions in Reduced Visibility Operation With and
Without the Use of Synthetic Vision System Operations (Brian
F. Gore, Savita Verma, Kevin M. Corker, Amit Jadhav, and Eromi
Guneratne) (PDF, 1.1 MB)
Chapter 6: Modeling
the NASA Baseline and SVS-Equipped Approach and Landing Scenarios
in D-OMAR (Stephen Deutsch, and Richard Pew) (PDF, 564 MB)
Chapter 7: Using an
Integrated Task Network Model With a Cognitive Architecture
to Assess the Impact of Technological Aids on Pilot Performance
(Christian Lebiere, Rick Archer, Dan Schunk, Eric Biefeld, Troy
Kelly, and Laurel Allender), (PDF, 472 MB)
Chapter 8: Attention-Situation
Awareness (A-SA) Model Final Report (Chris Wickens, Jason
McCarley, and Lisa Thomas) (PDF, 1.6 MB)
Modeling Approach and Landing
with Synthetic Vision Systems - Interim Reports and Publications
Byrne, M. (2005). Cognitive
Architectures in HCI: Present Work and Future Directions.
In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer
Interaction. Las Vegas, NV.
Lebiere, C., Archer, R., Warwick, W., & Schunk,
D. (2005). Integrating
Modeling and Simulation into a General-Purpose Tool. In Proceedings
of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction.
Las Vegas, NV.
Byrne, M. D., Kirlik, A., Fleetwood, M. D., Huss,
D. G., Kosorukoff, A., Lin, R., Fick, C. S. (2004). A
closed-loop, ACT-R approach to modeling approach and landing with
and without synthetic vision systems (SVS) technology. Proceedings
of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting
(pp. 2111-2115). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
Miller, S., Kirlik, A., Kosorukoff, A. & Byrne,
M. D. (2004). Ecological
Validity as a Mediator of Visual Attention Allocation in Human-Machine
Systems. (Technical Report AHFD-04-17/NASA-04-6). Savoy, IL:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Human Factors
Division.
Wickens, C. D., Alexander, A. L., Thomas, L. C.,
Horrey, W. J., Nunes, A., & Hardy, T. J, & Zheng, X. (2004).
Traffic and
Flight Guidance Depiction on a Synthetic Vision System Display:
The Effects of Clutter on Performance and Visual Attention Allocation.
(Technical Report AHFD-04-10/NASA(HPM)-04-1). Savoy, IL: University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Human Factors Division.
Deutsch, S., & Pew, R. (2004). Examining
new flight deck technology using human performance modeling.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual
Meeting. (pp.108-112). Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society.
Thomas, L. C., & Wickens, C. D. (2004). Eye-tracking
and individual differences in off-normal event detection when
flying with a Synthetic Vision System display. Proceedings
of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting.
(pp. 223-227). Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Wickens, C. D., Alexander, A. L., Horrey, W. J.,
Nunes, A., & Hardy, T. (2004). Traffic
and flight guidance depiction on a Synthetic Vision System display:
The effects of clutter on performance and visual attention allocation.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual
Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Goodman, A., Hooey, B. L., & Foyle, D. C. (2003).
Developing Cognitive Models of Approach and Landing with Augmented
Displays. (NASA Milestone Report). Moffett Field, CA: NASA
Ames Research Center.
Keller, J. W., & Leiden, K. (2002). Information
to Support the Human Performance Modeling of a B757 Flight Crew
during Approach and Landing: RNAV. (Technical Report). Boulder,
CO: Micro Analysis & Design.
Keller, J. W., & Leiden, K. (2002).
Information to Support the Human Performance Modeling of a B757
Flight Crew during Approach and Landing SVS Addendum. (Technical
Report). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis & Design.
Leiden, K., Keller, J. W., & French, J., (2002).
Information to
Support the Human Performance Modeling of a B757 Flight Crew during
Approach and Landing, (Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro
Analysis & Design.
Uhlarik, J. & Prey, C.M. (2002). Functional
Allocation Issues and Tradeoffs (FAIT) Analysis of Synthetic Vision
Systems (SVS).(Technical Report).
Back to top
Modeling Airport Taxi Operations
with Advanced Navigation Displays
Byrne, M. D. & Kirlik, A. (2005). Using
computational cognitive modeling to diagnose a possible sources
of aviation error. International Journal of Aviation Psychology,
15(2), 135-155.
Deutsch, S. & Pew, R. (2002). Modeling
human error in a real-world teamwork environment. Proceedings
of the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
(pp. 274-279), Fairfax, VA
Gore, B. F. (2002).
An emergent behavior model of complex human-system performance:
An aviation surface related application. VDI Bericht
1675, 1 (1), 313-328, Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI Verl
Gore, B. F., & Corker, K. M. (2002). Increasing
aviation safety using human performance modeling tools: An Air
Man-machine Integration Design and Analysis System application.
In M. J. Chinni (Ed). 2002 Military, Government and Aerospace
Simulation, 34(3), 183-188. San Diego: Society for Modeling and
Simulation International.
Lebiere, C., Biefeld, E., Archer, R., Archer, S.,
Allender, L.,& Kelley, T. D. (2002).
Imprint/ACT-R: Integration of a task network modeling architecture
with a cognitive architecture and its application to human error
modeling. In M. J. Chinni (Ed). 2002 Military, Government
and Aerospace Simulation, 34(3), 13-19. San Diego: Society for
Modeling and Simulation International.
McCarley, J. S., Wickens, C. D., Goh, J., &
Horrey, W. J. (2002). A
computational model of attention / situation awareness. Proceedings
of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society. 1669-1673. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society.
Gore, B.F., & Corker, K.M. (2001). Human
error modeling predictions: Increasing occupational safety using
human performance modeling tools. In B. Das, W. Karwowski,
P. Modelo, and M. Mattila (eds.), Computer-Aided Ergonomics and
Safety (CAES) 2001 Conference Proceedings, July 28 - August 4,
Maui, Hawaii.
Back to top
Crew Activity Tracking
System (CATS)
Callantine, T. (2005). Computational
modeling of air traffic control: Terminal-area case study.
Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems,
Man, and Cybernetics, Kona, HI, 2249-2254.
Callantine, T. J. (2005). Performance
Evaluation of a Computational Model of En Route Air Traffic Control.
Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology,
Oklahoma City, April 18-21.
Callantine, T. (2004). Catalog/Classification of
Errors Detectable with the Crew Activity Tracking System (CATS).
San Jose State University Technical Report, July, 2004.
Callantine, T. (2003). Error
Generation in CATS-based Agents. NASA Contractor Report 2003-212263.
Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Callantine, T. (2003). Detecting
and simulating pilot errors for safety enhancement, SAE Technical
Paper 2003-01-2998, Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Callantine, T. (2002).
A representation of air traffic control clearance constraints
for intelligent agent. In A. El Kamel, K. Mellouli, and P.
Bourne (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference
on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, #WA1C2, (CD-ROM).
Callantine, T. (2002). CATS-based
agents that err. NASA Contractor Report 2002-211858. Moffett
Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Callantine, T. (2002). CATS-based
air traffic controller agents. NASA Contractor Report 2002-211856.
Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
Callantine, T. (2002). Activity
tracking for pilot error detection from flight data. NASA
Contractor Report 2002-211406. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research
Center.
Callantine, T. (2002). Activity
tracking for pilot error detection from flight data. Proceedings
of the 21st European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making
and Control, Glasgow, 16-26.
Callantine, T. (2001). Agents
for analysis and design of complex systems. Proceedings of
the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,
567-573
Callantine, T. (2001). Analysis
of flight operational quality assurance data using model-based
activity tracking. SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-2640. Warrendale,
PA: SAE International.
Callantine, T. (2001). The
crew activity tracking system: Leveraging flight data for aiding,
training, and analysis. Proceedings of the 20th Digital
Avionics Systems Conference, 5.C.3-1-5.C.3-12 (CD-ROM).
Back to top
More on Human Performance
Modeling
Deutsch, S., & Pew, R. W. (2005). Single
Pilot Commerical Aircraft Operation. BBN Technical Report
No 8436. Cambridge, MA: BBN Technologies.
Muthard, E. K., & Wickens, C. D. (2005). Display
Size Contamination of Attentional and Spatial Tasks: An Evaluation
of Display Minification and Axis Compression. (AHFD-05-12/NASA-05-3).
Savoy, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation
Human Factors Division.
Deutsch, S. (2005). Reconceptualizing
expertise: Explaining an expert's error. Proceedings of the
7th Naturalistic Decision Making Conference. Amsterdam.
Leiden, K., Laughery, K.R., Keller, J. W., French,
J.W., Warwick, W. & Wood, S.D. (2001). A
Review of Human Performance Models for the Prediction of Human
Error. (Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro Analysis &
Design.
Leiden, K., Keller, J. W., & French, J.W. (2001).
Context of Human Error in
Commercial Aviation. (Technical Report). Boulder, CO: Micro
Analysis & Design.
Wickens, C. D. (2002).
Spatial Awareness Biases (ARL-02-6/NASA-02-4). Savoy, IL:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aviation Research
Lab.
Gore, B.F. (2002). Human
performance cognitive-behavioral modeling: A benefit for occupational
safety. In B. Chase & W. Karwowski (Eds.), International
Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE), 8 (3), 339-351.
Back to top
|
